canonical jewish mysticism Hebrew

Chalal חלל

the vacated space, the void -- the empty region (makom panui) left at the center when Ein Sof contracted

Chalal (חלל, “void, empty space”) is the Lurianic name for the vacated region left at the center of Ein Sof when the divine light contracted (tzimtzum). In Chayyim Vital’s Etz Chaim (Sha’ar 1, Derush Igulim ve-Yosher) it appears as a cluster of three near- synonyms used for a single referent: makom panui (the vacated place), avir reikani (empty air), and chalal reikani (empty void). It is the arena within which Adam Kadmon and the four worlds are subsequently emanated: “all of them together are within the vacated space, and there is nothing outside it.”

The chalal is the spatial protagonist of the Lurianic creation account. Where prior Kabbalah described emanation as a continuous overflow from Ein Sof, the Lurianic system interposes a withdrawal first: divinity contracts away from a central point, and only into the resulting chalal does the kav (the line of light) then descend to build the worlds. The void is therefore not nothing — a reshimu (residue) of light remains in it, and Ein Sof continues to surround it on every side — but it is the condition under which anything bounded and other-than-Ein-Sof can come to be.

Etymology

Root Ch-L-L (chet-lamed-lamed), “to be hollow, pierced, profane.” The same root yields chalal in the sense of a slain or hollowed body (Numbers 19:16) and the verb l’chalel (to profane, to make common). In the Lurianic usage the spatial-hollow sense dominates: the chalal is a hollow, an emptied interior. Vital pairs it with makom panui (from panah, to turn away / clear out — a place that has been cleared) and avir reikani (empty air, from reik, empty). The three terms are a deliberate triad, not loose repetition: they fix the referent as a region that has been vacated, is empty of manifest light, and yet is bounded and shaped (it is round, Vital insists, because Ein Sof contracted equally on all sides).

Place in the cosmogony

In Derush Igulim ve-Yosher the chalal is established in three moves. First the contraction leaves it (Sha’ar 1, ch. 2: “He contracted that light and withdrew toward the sides surrounding the central point, and there remained a vacated place, and empty air, and an empty void”). Second, Vital argues the chalal must be perfectly round, since a uniformly equal light could only contract uniformly, leaving no protruding angles. Third, the kav is drawn into it “from above to below,” so that the chalal becomes the container of Adam Kadmon and, nested within, the worlds of Atzilut, Beriah, Yetzirah, and Asiyah, “like the coats of an onion.” The material world sits at the dead center of the chalal, the point furthest from the surrounding light, which is why (Vital says) it is the most corporeal of all.

Usage across traditions

Tradition Figure Text Specific sense Citation
Jewish mysticism Chayyim Vital Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 1 The vacated space left by the tzimtzum; makom panui / avir reikani / chalal as one referent; round, and the arena of all the worlds Derush Igulim ve-Yosher, ch. 2
Jewish mysticism T Schneur Zalman of Liadi Tanya, Sha’ar haYichud On the figurative reading, the “emptiness” of the chalal is only a concealment; Ein Sof is in fact no less present within it Part II, ch. 7
Jewish mysticism T Chayyim of Volozhin Nefesh haChaim The chalal as concealment rather than real removal; God fills it “as a soul within a body” Sha’ar 3

Cross-tradition parallels marked T reflect documented historical transmission with the transmission channel named above. Parallels marked S reflect structural analogy: independent developments that converge on similar conceptual territory. The distinction is editorial not evaluative.

Jewish mysticism Chayyim Vital

Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 1

The vacated space left by the tzimtzum; makom panui / avir reikani / chalal as one referent; round, and the arena of all the worlds

Derush Igulim ve-Yosher, ch. 2

Jewish mysticism T Schneur Zalman of Liadi

Tanya, Sha’ar haYichud

On the figurative reading, the “emptiness” of the chalal is only a concealment; Ein Sof is in fact no less present within it

Part II, ch. 7

Jewish mysticism T Chayyim of Volozhin

Nefesh haChaim

The chalal as concealment rather than real removal; God fills it “as a soul within a body”

Sha’ar 3

Contested meanings

The ontological status of the chalal is the precise point on which the great literal-versus-figurative dispute over tzimtzum turns. On the literal reading (kifshuto, classically attributed to the Vilna Gaon), the chalal is genuinely empty of the Infinite’s manifest presence: a real vacancy, the condition for a creation that is truly other than God. On the figurative reading (lo kifshuto, Schneur Zalman and Chabad; and, in a different key, Chayyim of Volozhin’s Nefesh haChaim), the “emptiness” of the chalal is only apparent, a concealment registered from the standpoint of the creature; Ein Sof remains no less present within it. The reshimu — the residue of light that remains in the chalal — is the textual hook both readings must account for. (See the Sugya map of the tzimtzum, which holds the positions without adjudicating.)

A point of terminological discipline: the chalal is a spatial term and must not be collapsed into ayin (the divine Nothing). Ayin is an apophatic name for the divine as it exceeds being; chalal is the vacated region within which beings come to be. The two belong to different registers, and the Lurianic text keeps them distinct.

Primary sources

  • Etz Chaim, Sha’ar 1, Derush Igulim ve-Yosher, ch. 2 (Vital, recording Luria) — the foundational description of the chalal.
  • Tanya, Part II (Sha’ar haYichud vehaEmunah), ch. 7 (Schneur Zalman) — the chalal under the figurative reading.
  • Nefesh haChaim, Sha’ar 3 (Chayyim of Volozhin) — concealment rather than removal.

Scholarly literature

  • Scholem, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, Seventh Lecture — the Lurianic withdrawal and the space it opens.
  • Fine, Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos — the Lurianic system and its Safed setting.
  • Fraenkel, Nefesh HaTzimtzum (2015) — the argument that the protagonists of the tzimtzum debate share an underlying (non-literal) concept of the vacated space.
  • Menzi and Padeh, The Tree of Life (1999) — the standard modern English of the early gates of Etz Chaim.
Tradition
jewish mysticism
Language
Hebrew
Script
Hebrew
Last revised
2026-05-02

Hekhal Editorial

Cite this page

Stable URLs are part of the editorial commitment. This address will not change.

Hekhal Editorial. "Chalal." Hekhal: An Open Reference for Esoteric Tradition. Last modified May 2, 2026. https://hekhal.org/lexicon/chalal.